Jon Holato

Twitter: $50 on black let's gooo.. Atlantic City for the weekend

Digg and Reddit No Match For Media Temple

I feel compelled to make a post thanking my wonderful Web host Media Temple. As many of you are undoubtedly aware, this site made the front page of both Digg and Reddit a few days ago for a post about Doda Elektroda. What you may not be aware of, however, is just how much stress that can put on a server.

This site is currently being hosted on Media Temple’s Grid-Server (gs) service. What this means is that jonholato.com is hosted on a network of interconnected servers, each sharing resources with one another. Thus, Media Temple measures server load for jonholato.com in terms of Grid Performance Units (GPUs). Each month my site is given a monthly allowance of 1000 GPUs. At the end end of each billing cycle the number gets reset to 1000, unfortunately it’s not an AT&T rollover type of situation.

According to Media Temple’s Web site, GPUs are calculated as follows:

A GPU is a measurement that derives from CPU time required by every single hit/request made to your (gs) Grid-Service. This includes your web server activity, programs, scripts and all associated parent and child processes across all nodes within our system (100’s of processor cores). The GRID system keeps track of all the measurements taken from your server and adds them to a running total which is calculated about once an hour. Each (gs) Grid-Service plan is given 1000 GPUs monthly, which is equivalent to continuously using 10% of a processor core for one month. This breaks down to 1.4 GPUs per hour.

To give you an idea of just how much stress was put on my server a few days ago, my average monthly GPU consumption since switching to Media Temple has historically been around 200. However, on Tuesday it was 258.

Media Temple 258 GPU Graph

I don’t want to get into the specifics of traffic, but for the sake of illustration once this site hit the front page of Digg it was getting about 15-20 visits per second for over an hour:

Statcounter 1

Statcounter 2

Despite the influx of traffic, not once did this site become unresponsive or go down. My previous Web host (which I won’t mention by name) crashed three times when I hit the front page of Reddit for the first time — not even during peak hours — and I had to dismantle large sections of code to keep it running. After that I switched to Media Temple for the reputation it has of being able to withstand the Digg effect, and I must say it has more than lived up to it’s reputation.

So a big thank you to Media Temple, for being the Web host I can depend on.

7 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. MyAvatars 0.2

    And you haven’t even used any caching. This is nice, isn’t it? :)

  2. MyAvatars 0.2

    Nope, no caching. I’m still baffled at the load that was put on this server and loving Media Temple more each day.

  3. MyAvatars 0.2

    Steve

    Something’s up at Media Temple now. A number of customers are experiencing HUGE slowdowns in server response time.

  4. MyAvatars 0.2

    @ Steve - I haven’t experienced any such slowdown. Can you reference some information to support this claim?

  5. MyAvatars 0.2

    I think I’m about to switch to MT because of this service. Any time I get even a small spike MySQL burps and my site goes down, which I think is why I can’t ever get above 10k impressions/day for all these years now. I finally decided it was time to do some serious investigation into the problem and MySQL is obviously the bottleneck, and MT seems to be the only host that’s figured this out so far. The truth is that bandwidth is no longer the issue anymore! It’s our stupid dependence on MySQL, which I avoided for so many years but now I’m depending on it like everyone else, like coffee. I’m curious to know how many of these units I’d use in a month, but for $20 it’s worth a try. What I also like is MT’s advertised “MySQL GridContainers” option, sounds like you can pay for even more MySQL performance if that’s what you need. If this works I will kick myself for not finding it sooner.

Reply to “Digg and Reddit No Match For Media Temple”